web crawler - Why does simple email obfuscation work so well? -


for example replacing @ at. @ least 1 study demonstrated effectiveness:

to our surprise, none of crawlers visited our departmental research , course , research web pages led spam on email addresses containing at.

another experiment demonstrated same thing, showing using at , dot reduced spam 2 orders of magnitude.

the first study speculated spammers obtain enough plain-text email addresses ignore obfuscated ones. parsing at in addition @ should trivial. why don't spammers account such simple obfuscation?

i no expert...but intuitively makes sense @ symbol less commonly used in non-email-related speech. @ sign set email address apart other text. if use at, blends in normal english.

at pretty common word after :p i'm sure still possible parse out "at" version of email, more difficult of regex.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c# - SharpSVN - How to get the previous revision? -

c++ - Is it possible to compile a VST on linux? -

url - Querystring manipulation of email Address in PHP -