web crawler - Why does simple email obfuscation work so well? -
for example replacing @
at
. @ least 1 study demonstrated effectiveness:
to our surprise, none of crawlers visited our departmental research , course , research web pages led spam on email addresses containing
at
.
another experiment demonstrated same thing, showing using at
, dot
reduced spam 2 orders of magnitude.
the first study speculated spammers obtain enough plain-text email addresses ignore obfuscated ones. parsing at
in addition @
should trivial. why don't spammers account such simple obfuscation?
i no expert...but intuitively makes sense @ symbol less commonly used in non-email-related speech. @ sign set email address apart other text. if use at, blends in normal english.
at pretty common word after :p i'm sure still possible parse out "at" version of email, more difficult of regex.
Comments
Post a Comment